Comments on: Friendly URLs (revisited) https://hm2k.org/posts/friendly-urls Research and development Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:54:58 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.5.1 By: hm2k https://hm2k.org/posts/friendly-urls/comment-page-1#comment-119194 Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:55:48 +0000 http://www.hm2k.com/posts/friendly-urls#comment-119194 I don’t like MultiViews, second guessing isn’t really something I like my web server to do, further more rewrites are so much more powerful.

]]>
By: Zeeshan https://hm2k.org/posts/friendly-urls/comment-page-1#comment-88544 Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:30:40 +0000 http://www.hm2k.com/posts/friendly-urls#comment-88544 I would have to agree. Using a resource extensive module to act as glue between your application and the HTTPd is wasteful. Consider using the PATH_INFO environment via MultiViews, as Ben Steele highlighted. It’s also possible to use it via SetAction and ForceType.

]]>
By: Ben Steele https://hm2k.org/posts/friendly-urls/comment-page-1#comment-6 Sun, 28 Jan 2007 10:52:03 +0000 http://www.hm2k.com/posts/friendly-urls#comment-6 Multiviews is also an option here, although it takes a little bit more time preparing your code the finished url output is excellent.

]]>